Why Did Romans Want to Copy Greek Works of Art
This was not the basis for Jesus Christ.
Are the Bible accounts of Jesus plagiarizing the story of Horus, Krishna, Mithras, Dionysis and other pagan Gods? – A Critical Examination
"Was Jesus a Copy of Horus, Mithras, Krishna, Dionysis and Other Pagan Gods?"
This question is often asked specially in calorie-free of the viral motion picture 'Zeitgeist' a mega-popular documentary about the New World Lodge and Illuminati. The flick spent over xxx minutes attacking the Bible and the Christian organized religion and specifically the idea that the story of Jesus Christ in the Gospels is nothing more than than a copy of the story of the Egyptian God Horus, Mithras and other pagan gods. Additionally Dan Chocolate-brown author of the DaVinci Lawmaking, 1 of the most blasphemous, Anti-Christian books e'er written, stated "nothing in Christianity is original" as he promotes the idea these mythological figures served equally the ground for the Gospel accounts of Jesus Christ (Dark-brown's latest book, 'The Lost Symbol', takes this idea to the extreme – an article on this book and the upcoming movie will be posted before long). This commodity volition show that non only are these claims incorrect and lack whatsoever substantive evidence, merely that they are part of a greater spiritual calendar that Dan Brownish, the Zeitgeist film and others have in common.
Was Jesus a Re-create of Horus?
The Egyptian God Horus.
The Zeitgeist moving-picture show makes a number of wild statements about Horus to effort to prove that Jesus is a copy. But allow's look at the claims against actual Egyptian mythology:
"Horus was built-in on Dec 25th" — According to Egyptian mythological history, Horus's birthday is celebrated in the season of Khoiak, which runs in the months of October and Nov, not Dec 25th. Furthermore, the engagement of December 25th is never mentioned in the Bible every bit the appointment of Jesus' birth and thus has no relevance to the account of Jesus' life. So right away, the claims of "plagiarism" expect completely baseless.
"Horus was born of a virgin" — There are two accounts of Horus' birth. The most famous past far, was that Horus was born from his female parent Isis, who was not a virgin, but rather a widow of the slain Osiris. Through sorcery, Isis, assembled the body of Osiris and was impregnated with his phallus. Clearly this was a sexual union and not a virgin nascency. The "Hymn to Osiris" which records this account states: "[Isis] made to ascent up the helpless members [phallus] of him whose eye was at rest, she drew from him his essence [DNA material], and she made therefrom an heir [Horus]." (Source and Source).
"Three Wise Men Came to Adore the New Born Savior"– No source is provided by the documentary for this claim. Additionally, the Bible does not say "three wise men" came to see Jesus. It never tells the states the number of wise men. And they did non come at Jesus' nativity in a manger. They came to his family abode when he was a toddler.
"Horus was a kid prodigy teacher at 12" — The picture show offers no pre-New Testament sources that country this.
"Horus had 12 Disciples" — Historian Glen Miller writes: "But again, my research in the academic literature does non surface this fact. I can notice references to 4 "disciples"–variously called the semi-divine HERU-SHEMSU ("Followers of Horus") [GOE:1.491]. I tin can find references to SIXTEEN human followers. And I can find reference to an UNNUMBERED group of followers called mesniu/mesnitu ("blacksmiths") who accompanied Horus in some of his battles [although these might be identified with the HERU-SHEMSU in GOE:1.84]. But I cannot find TWELVE anywhere…]"
Additionally, some of have said the 12 signs of the zodiac are the "disciples" of Horus. Even if this were the case, they are just stars and not bodily people who followed Horus, preached about him or recorded his life. This is some other empty and false merits.
"Horus was crucified. Dead for three days. And Resurrected" — There is no historical record in any credible Egyptian mythology of Horus being crucified. Additionally, crucifixion was a method of execution invented by the Roman Empire thousands of years after the time of the Horus myth. Whereas the accounts of Jesus' crucifixion exist in thousands of manuscripts from the century after his decease. Additionally, as nosotros detailed in our commodity "Did Jesus Really Exist? Proving Jesus without The Bible" there are many secular historical sources that record His crucifixion every bit described in the Bible.
If yous are wondering how Zeitgeist could brand such wild claims, that have no existent historical evidence, they do good from the Skeptic's Fallacy: in short, when it comes to attacking the credibility of the Bible it is assumed that the skeptic is completely credible. So the Zeitgeist creators know most people will not research their attacks and just accept it as factual (just equally Dan Brown did with the numerous inaccuracies of the DaVinci Code). If 1 takes the time, they will as well discover that Zeitgeist gets most all of its information from one source, a book chosen "The Christ Conspiracy" past a adult female named Acharya S. (nosotros will accost her afterwards).
Was Jesus a Copy of Mithras?
Aboriginal art depicting Mithras being born out of a rock.
Zeitgeist continues equally practice the skeptics with the idea that Christianity itself is a copy of the cult of Mithras, which was popularized in Rome in the 1st to 4th Century AD (note that it sprung upwards in Rome later the death of Christ and centuries afterwards the Sometime Testament prophecies of the Coming Messiah). The movie states:
"Mithras was born of a virgin" — There are almost no early writings about the cult of Mithras and most of what is known is based on artwork (as opposed to Jesus Christ, of whom thousands of aboriginal manuscripts exist that draw His life, death and resurrection in detail). But co-ordinate to historians, Mithras was built-in from a stone, non from a virgin or from a person at all.
"Mithras was built-in on December 25." — Once again, the date of December 25th is not mentioned in the Bible and thus holds no significance to the story of Jesus Christ. Additionally, in Mithraism there is no date of Mithras' nascence.
Mithras with "shepherds."
"Mithras was attended to by Shepherds" — This merits is based on the relief above. The primeval existing account of Mithras' birth is establish in a relief depicting him emerging from a stone with the assist of men who certainly announced to be shepherds (which is interesting considering his nascence was supposed to have preceded the creation of humans!). Such a blatant inconsistency should evidence a serious flaw in Mithraism enquiry, just the Zeitgeist team again overlooks this. Furthermore, this relief dates to 4th century A.D., well afterward the Gospels had been written and distributed over most of the known globe.
Mithras and his "12 disciples."
"Mithra had 12 disciples." — This is based on the etching above which shows Mithras surrounded by 12 signs of the Zodiac. In that location is no reason to conclude that signs of the Zodiac are "disciples." Remember, at that place is no written record of Mithra's existence from the 1st to quaternary centuries when the cult thrived. The earliest writings are from outsiders recording their observations. And so most of the wild assertions of Zeitgeist are just existence based on this piece of art. Franz Cumont, considered the first groovy researcher of Mithras claimed that the disciples in the relief were actually people dressed upwards as Zodiac signs, showing how ludicrous the effort to link Mithras to Jesus can get.
"Mithras was crucified. Expressionless for three days. And and then resurrected." — This charge in particular reveals the insincerity of the claims of plagiarism against Christianity. In Mithraism, Mithras never dies. He completed his earthly mission and returned to the skies in a chariot (ironically similar to the story of the Prophet Elijah in the Bible's Book of 1 Kings, written 800 years earlier). In Mithraism there is no historical mention of crucifixion, burial or resurrection in any artwork or text. In a critique of this theory, researcher Ronald Nash writes:
"Allegations of an early on Christian dependence on Mithraism take been rejected on many grounds. Mithraism had no concept of the death and resurrection of its god and no place for any concept of rebirth—at to the lowest degree during its early stages." In his book Paradigm and Value in the Greco-Roman Globe, Richard Gordon writes that there is "no death of Mithras," and thus there is no resurrection of Mithras.
• Dr. Edwin Yamauchi states: "We don't know anything near the death of Mithras…We take a lot of monuments, but we have almost no textual evidence, considering this was a secret organized religion. But I know of no references to a supposed expiry and resurrection."
It is also important to notation that for all of the research Franz Cumont did on Mithras, his overriding conclusion was that unlike Jesus Christ, who was a real person, Mithras did not be. Thus a basic test of the factual show shows that the Bible did not plagiarize from the story of Mithras.
Was Jesus Christ an Imitation of Dionysis?
Dionysus the Greco Roman god of wine.
Dionysus (too known as Bacchus) was a Greek and Roman god of vino. One of the boldest claims of Jesus being a re-create of Dionsyus was a volume called 'The Jesus Mysteries' which featured the amulet pictured below. on its cover. The authors claimed that the amulet was a depiction of the god Dionysus on a cross, and thus, they concluded, Christianity must accept copied the crucifixion account from the Greek god. However, upon basic scrutiny, the claim falls apart.
Dionysus pictured on a cross.
The authors of "The Jesus Mysteries" Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy had their sources for their information critiqued:
When dealing with aboriginal sources they are even more blatant. On the basis of some 3rd century pictures of crucifixions, the authors merits Bacchuus [Dionysus] was crucified and Christians copied the thought. This is their piece de resistance and they fifty-fifty put ane of the pictures on the cover of their book. But suppose there existed an earlier source who stated categorically that no infidel godman was crucified. That would destroy their instance and reading the Jesus Mysteries you would presume that neither Freke or Gandy knew of such a source even if it existed. You would be incorrect.They quote from Justin Martyr many times well-nigh his concerns that pagans and Christians had some like rituals (they did and modernistic scholarship is totally unsurprised by this). He is a second century writer who therefore predates all the pictures of pagan godmen being crucified and he writes:
"Simply in no case, not even in whatever of those chosen sons of Jupiter, did they imitate the being crucified; for it was not understood past them, all the things said of it having been put symbolically." Justin Martyr 's First Apology LV.
No honest scholar would simply fail to quote this vitally of import contradiction to their thesis. Gandy did effort to explain away this passage when it was presented to him but failed utterly and certainly could non say why he e'er felt he could but miss it out of his book. (source)
Even if the amulet was real, information technology's dated to over 300 years later on the crucifixion of Christ. Past the fourth century tens of thousands of New Testament manuscripts were in apportionment all over the earth and the Roman Empire made Christianity its official religion. And then the story of Christ's crucifixion was very well-known. Thus the idea that a 4th century amulet was the inspiration for the Crucifixion in the Gospel's makes no sense. We cited the Roman historian Tacitus who in 115 AD wrote:
"Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians past the populace. Christus, from whom the proper name had its origin, suffered the farthermost penalisation during the reign of Tiberius at the easily of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a near mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, over again broke out non only in Judaea, the start source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world detect their centre and become popular. (source)
So again, the business relationship of Jesus' crucifixion at the orders of Pontius Pilate, just as the Bible details, was well-known even in non-Christian circles.
"Dionysus was born of a virgin" — Once again, this blatantly flies in the face up of mythology surrounding this infidel god. The two almost common stories of Dionysus' birth involve the god Zeus, his father, either impregnating the mortal woman Semele, or impregnating Persephone (the Greek Queen of the underworld). In either instance, it is not a virgin birth (and it besides gives allusion to the Bible's description of fallen angels impregnating human women, something written in the book of Genesis 2,000 years earlier the myth of Dionysus).
"Dionsysus was born on December 25th" — Once more, at that place is no pre-Christian manuscript or testify of this. And of form the date of Dec 25th is not significant since it'due south not in the Bible. Some point to Dionysus' ability to create wine as a sign that Jesus was a re-create (since Jesus turned water to wine at a wedding) merely Dionysus was the god of vino. Jesus was the Son of God and humanity's Savior. And while there is non-Christian testify and proof that Jesus existed, at that place is none to support that Dionysus was a existent person who actually existed. And Jesus Christ was clearly not a copy of Dionysus.
Was Jesus Christ a Copy of Krishna?
The Hindu God Krishna.
Every bit the Devine Evidence weblog states:
In Hinduism, Krishna is believed to be the 8th avatar of Vishnu, the second attribute of the Hindu trinity. Most every correlation between Krishna and Jesus tin be traced to Kersey Graves, a 19th century author who believed Christianity was created from pagan myths. Though his works accept been proven by scholars to be faux and poorly researched (Source), many even so ignorantly refer to his arguments not knowing they are easily disproved by simply comparing the Bible to the Hindu texts.
Zeitgeist Debunked
"Krishna was born of a virgin named Devaki" — The bones story of Krishna'southward origin makes this claim laughable: In mythology researcher Joseph Campbell's volume, Occidental Mythology, he writes of Krishna's origin:
"In Republic of india a similar tale is told of the beloved savior Krishna, whose terrible uncle, Kansa, was, in that case, the tyrant-king. The savior's mother, Devaki, was of majestic lineage, the tyrant's niece, and at the time when she was married the wicked monarch heard a voice, mysteriously, which let him know that her eighth child would be his slayer. He therefore confined both her and her husband, the saintly nobleman Vasudeva, in a closely guarded prison, where he murdered their commencement half dozen infants every bit they came."
So from the basic origin story of Krishna, his mother had 7 children before he was born, and then she was conspicuously not a virgin. Additionally, the book of Isaiah, which prophesied that a virgin would requite birth to the Messiah of the Bible, was written 700 years earlier Christ and at least 100 years before Krishna.
"At that place was Babe massacre in all the land at the time of Krishna'southward birth" – In the Gospel accounts, King Herod, upon hearing the Jewish Messiah has been born, orders all Jewish male person infants to exist killed. Skeptics claim a similar occurrence happened with Krishna merely as the account above shows, only his vi brothers were killed.
"Krishna was crucified. Died for 3 days. And was resurrected." – This again is but a blatant mistruth in the face of Hindu mythology. The explanation of Krishna'south decease is stated clearly: "
"A trigger-happy hunter of the name of Jara and so came there, desirous of deer. The hunter, mistaking [Krishna], who was stretched on the earth in high Yoga, for a deer, pierced him at the heel with a shaft and quickly came to that spot for capturing his casualty." Mahabharata, Book sixteen, 4
Not only was Krishna not crucified, his story sounds much more familiar to the account of the death of Achilles in Greek mythology than the account of Jesus' crucifixion.
In that location are later Hindu texts that do draw more than close parallels between Jesus Christ and Krishna. Just these texts were written centuries after the New Testament. In fact, the Bahagavad Gita, one of the principal Holy Books of Hinduism, is now thought past Hindu scholars to have been drastically changed in 800 AD. The nowadays twenty-four hours Bahagavad Gita has 700 verses. The original, called Gita had 84 (imagine the documentaries and books that would exist made if information technology were discovered that the Bible went through such a drastic re-write!). In the volume, The Gita As It Was: Rediscovering the Original Bhagavadgita, the author, Dr. Phulgenda Sinha, writes:
Effectually 800 A.D. , the original Gita was interpolated and ended up having 700 verses. The proper noun was changed from Gita to Bhagavad Gita. The concept of one single Almighty God, or Supreme, Bhagavan, was introduced to Indian society.
Till then, before 800 A.D., Indians believed in God. Just they believed in polytheism. They were as well nature worshippers. They worshipped world, rock, trees, rain, wind, fire, dominicus, moon etc.
Jesus is clearly not an imitation of Krishna and the Bible did not plagiarize pagan gods. Unlike the New Testament, which has been verified by manuscript testify to exist the most reliable and substantiated certificate in antiquity, the holy volume of Hinduism went through drastic changes centuries later on it was written. But of course, the Zeitgesit producers, Acharya S. and Dan Brown ignore all of this simply to endeavour to attack the credibility of the Bible. Why? Considering they hate the Bible and want to push a Satanic agenda.
Who Is Acharya S?
D.M. Moore, aka Acharya South.
As nosotros mentioned above, virtually all of the sources cited by Zietgiest go back to Achraya Southward., writer of "The Christ Conspiracy." But who is she? First off, her name is Dorothy Murdoch. And in her own writings she cites "D.M. Murdoch" as a source, which is citing herself. This should be a huge crimson flag to her credibility. She has been debunked and criticized by many serious historical scholars. But more than importantly, where did xcasinobonuses Acharya S. become the information for her Christ Conspiracy book in the beginning place? It came from Gerald Massey and Madame H.P. Blavatsky.
Blavatsky, the founder of the Theosophical Society, is i of the main inspirations for the modernistic New Historic period Motion. She was also an agog Luciferian. Blavatsky wrote her books via automatic writing" in which a spirit possessed her and used her body to write her books on mysticism and Luciferian New Age beliefs. Blavatsky believed that through esoteric, occult magical practices, mankind could ascend and evolve to god-like status. All with assistance from "the hierarchy" — angelic beings who could guide those with proper knowledge. This of class is the first lie of Satan in the Garden of Eden, who lured Fifty-fifty into sinning with the hope that "ye shall exist equally gods.." The idea of achieving godhood and "rise" is at the heart of the New Age movement today. Those special, enlightened ones could then form a super race that would rule over humanity.
She was a friend of Satanist Aleister Crolwey and her writings inspired Adolf Hitler. Blavatsky makes no hush-hush of her allegiance:
"Ane of the most hidden secrets involves the so-chosen fall of Angels. Satan and his rebellious host will thus prove to have become the directly Saviours and Creators of divine man. Thus Satan, once he ceases to be viewed in the superstitious spirit of the church, grows into the grandiose image. It is Satan who is the God of our planet and the only God. Satan (or Match) represents the Centrifugal Energy of the Universe, this ever-living symbol of cocky-sacrifice for the intellectual independence of humanity. "(The Secret Doctrine, Volume Two, Pages 215, 216, 220, 245, 255, 533).
She was also the publisher of Friction match Magazine. Massey was a writer for Lucifer magazine. Her closest student, Alice Bailey, took over the reigns of the Theosophical Society equally well as started the publishing company called Lucifer Trust (it is now known equally Lucis Trust). Her stated goal was the preparation of the minds of society to receive "the Christ", who is non Jesus but a dandy ascend wise master who volition unite all the religions of the world, pedagogy the aware followers to godhood, led by the truthful god, who Bailey openly identifies as Satan. And this is the ground for the data that went into making Zeitgeist. As shown in the video below on the Zeitgeist film, it is pushing the verbal same thought.
In The Lost Symbol, Dan Brown also takes the plunge as he proclaims that Christianity is just a spin off of aboriginal mystery religions. Practice not be deceived. For those who are in the "truth movement" or "Anti-New Globe Order", these ideas intend to assert that Christianity is just some other class of command and was manufactured to dispense people. Just as shown, the charges are ludicrous with the slightest inspection. And at the finish of the day, the same people who are putting out the thought of Jesus beingness a copy of infidel gods all get linked back to the same false god: Satan. This clever deception is helping to usher in the "New Order" that will exist led by the Antichrist. Jesus warned of 1 of the cardinal signs of the cease times approaching:
"the disciples came unto him privately, saying, Tell united states, when shall these things be? and what shall exist the sign of thy coming, and of the finish of the globe? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Accept mind that no man deceive y'all. For many shall come in my proper noun, maxim, I am Christ; and shall deceive many." (Matthew 24:3-v).
Unprecedented charade would be a major sign and Zeitgeist, The Lost Symbol and books like the Christ Conspiracy are just a few of the examples. Jesus Christ did be. Jesus Christ was born of a virgin. Jesus Christ had 12 disciples. Jesus Christ was crucified. Simply most importantly, Jesus Christ died for you. He chose to dice to offer Himself as a sacrifice to pay the debt for the sins of humanity. And He is the only name which can exist called on for salvation. Information technology only takes conventionalities in what He did to receive eternal life. Jesus said: "And this is the will of him that sent me, that every one which seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life: and I will heighten him up at the last day. " No one else died on a cross for the sins of humanity. Jesus did. And it but takes belief in Him to receive eternal life and be freed from the punishment of hell. Which is why Satan has to work so hard to confuses the public and distort the message of the Bible. No other religious effigy receives close to the scrutiny that Jesus does. And however the Bible still stands equally truthful. So if you now believe that Jesus was not only a copy of a pagan god, maybe information technology is fourth dimension to start believing that He is indeed the Son of God who wants to spend eternity with you.
For a full presentation that debunks all of the claims of the Zeitgeist film see below:
And for those who believe that tin can evidence the claims of Zeitgeist in that location is a chance to win money at the website "Zeitgeist Challenge" (no one has won yet).
Related posts:
franklinpural1985.blogspot.com
Source: https://beginningandend.com/jesus-copy-horus-mithras-dionysis-pagan-gods/
0 Response to "Why Did Romans Want to Copy Greek Works of Art"
Post a Comment